Sunday, February 23, 2020

SAM 400 UNIT 8 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

SAM 400 UNIT 8 - Essay Example ate the team members to be aware that their tasks are mutually dependent thereby increasing the flexibility of the team and increasing the team’s response time (Musselwhite, 2007). The team’s response quality is extremely reliant on the feedback gotten from the leader of the team, customers and other members of the team. Musselwhite (2007) asserts that obtaining timely feedback is vital to the team’s success. On the other hand, the team leader is supposed to make sure that feedback has reached the whole team according to its metrics and goals. In addition, feedback is supposed to be obtained in time in case of corrections and adjustments. Mostly, feedback is obtained too late for it to add any practical value. Even if feedback may be used in planning future things, instant corrections needed in performance may not be enhanced by it. Feedback can be termed as a productive communication. It is very useful to a team leader. Communication that is productive within the team is very essential. This communication among team members may lead to improvement in the productivity and quality of the team. Timely feedback can differentiate between a team viewing mistakes as great opportunities and a team that is concealing its mistakes (Musselwhite, 2007). In a certain point when the team sees faults as chances of improving the results of a team, it indicates that the leader of that team has effectively developed an environment that endorses solving of problems. When the members of the team are allowed to develop their performance, they can be more engaged and proactive. Moreover, teams have big ownership of results discovered by them. According to Musselwhite (2007), another way of creating a team structure that is overly effective is by developing an environment suitable to solve problems. In case the structure of the team is poorly arranged, it can lead to negative behaviors among the team members and hinder communication. In an event whereby the team is having

Friday, February 7, 2020

Individual Rights and Social Order Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Individual Rights and Social Order - Assignment Example Additionally, it was necessary to safeguard the overall well-being of the community. The Commission also observed that in fulfilling this function, a system of justice tends to possess a divided role. Some of the roles were certain prevention of activities and the apprehension and formal processing of individuals, who have committed illegal acts in the society. According to Beames and Stonehouse (2007), a good society is one that nurtures both social values and the rights of an individual. A significant facet of good societies is that they find a healthy tension between individual needs and the needs of a group. Social order lies at the opposite end of the spectrum from individualism. Social conservatives are more interested in reinforcing the moral order. They prefer legislation use, rather than relying on normative means of impacting the behavior of an individual, to promote the values they hold. Examples of normative means that can influence individual behavior include leadership, moral voices within the society and education. Individual rights is the act of seeking to protect the personal freedoms of an individual within the criminal justice system, while social order is whereby the societys interest take precedence over the rights of an individual. Numerous laws and regulation have been put into place to balance the two sides throughout the American history. People are guaranteed the right to free assembly and free speech. However, those rights guaranteed by the Constitution may be limited when those actions harm others. For instance, when the actions of a citizen become violent, the authorities have a duty to halt the violence ant to shield the society. Governments considered to be democratic promote the freedom value but must also place limits on the freedom of an individual. Actions that might cause harm or alarm are forbidden for the common good. For instance, a person has the freedom of speech,